Standard 3 Reflection:
Improve teaching and learning through the use of
educational research
at the classroom and school levels
Background
Over the years of teaching in my current school district we have been given articles to read
that report their findings on topics such as best teaching instructional practices and
engaging students in longer classes. I have also been in meetings where we have analyzed
our state testing data by making observations and asking questions/making wonderings.
Additionally, I have done limited research for my focus for Teacher Principal Evaluation
Program (TPEP) as well as analyzing data for my growth goal.
Learning and Applied Practice
Previous to starting my Master’s in Educational Leadership, I relied on educational coaches
and administers to provide articles that supported me making changes in my teaching
practices. Although I was willing to be an early adopter of technology as well as PBIS and
using GLAD strategies, I didn’t have a formal process of evaluating and reporting whether they made a difference or not. As a result of my Action Research in School Settings class I now have a process to go through to make this possible. As a result of taking a class on action research I will be able to use the process as I look at other areas of improving my teaching practices as well as sharing this process with others as a way to approach their TPEP growth goals. I will also provide time for my students (in this case now teachers) to reflect and get feedback from others. Additionally, when I am asked to write/co-write rubrics they will be clearer than in the past. Lastly, I will also promote providing opportunities for students to reflect and improve upon their writing.
using GLAD strategies, I didn’t have a formal process of evaluating and reporting whether they made a difference or not. As a result of my Action Research in School Settings class I now have a process to go through to make this possible. As a result of taking a class on action research I will be able to use the process as I look at other areas of improving my teaching practices as well as sharing this process with others as a way to approach their TPEP growth goals. I will also provide time for my students (in this case now teachers) to reflect and get feedback from others. Additionally, when I am asked to write/co-write rubrics they will be clearer than in the past. Lastly, I will also promote providing opportunities for students to reflect and improve upon their writing.
In addition, as a result of taking the Applying Research in Educational Settings class I feel
that I have more tools to evaluate articles versus just assuming since they were published
that they have studies that back their reporting which will help me be more credible as a
teacher leader or coach. As a result of the Applying Research in Educational Settings class
I will be able to evaluate articles that are written in professional journals better. I will also
be looking at the primary sources/studies that were done.
Issues Encountered/Problems of Practice Addressed
Action Research in School Settings
In our Accomplished Teacher class we got a head start on our project for Action Research
in School Settings by picking our topic of interest which appreciated since it gave us more
time to gather data. I choose to investigate strategies that would help my students to
look at feedback provided for them from me or their peers to improve upon their learning
in my classroom since that was what I was focusing on for TPEP that particular year.
For this class, we started the action research project by finding a focus, providing our
rationale for our selection, and doing a literature review for our final project. As we went
through this process I found some strategies that I would like to try such as:
-- using technology so they have an electronic portfolio and can see
where they have been and where they are going.
-- giving sentence starters
-- designing reflective prompts
--teaching SMART goals and having student make SMART goals that can be re-addressed over time so they can see how far they have come.
--sharing reflections with their peers
-- modeling reflective thinking
-- giving sentence starters
-- designing reflective prompts
--teaching SMART goals and having student make SMART goals that can be re-addressed over time so they can see how far they have come.
--sharing reflections with their peers
-- modeling reflective thinking
When we started our Action Research in School Settings class we began by writing a
theory of action draft. While working on this draft I realized that not only did I need to
get my students look at the feedback, I needed to explicitly teach them how to read a
rubric and give feedback to each other as well as provide opportunities for students to reflect upon their work. I also grew in my thinking and writing of rubrics in that I now look at what I want my students to accomplish and put that in my “meet standard” category and work from there in creating the expectations of the other levels.
rubric and give feedback to each other as well as provide opportunities for students to reflect upon their work. I also grew in my thinking and writing of rubrics in that I now look at what I want my students to accomplish and put that in my “meet standard” category and work from there in creating the expectations of the other levels.
Then we presented our process and our findings to our classmates through a presentation
and by writing our analysis and reflection of our action research. Although by looking at
my rubric (yellow - baseline, blue - conclusion), you can see my students did make some
progress during this two-month period of time. But, by continuing with these practices
throughout the year I saw many more of my students meet or exceeding standard in
these categories and this transferred to their increased scores for using reasoning in
their writing which was our grade level/department growth goal .
Applying Research to School Settings
Additionally, through the Applying Research in School Settings class, I have learned how
to evaluation professional articles more thoroughly. This is an important skill to have a
as leadership leader/educational coach since those who we lead expect us to do our due
diligence when reading and using articles in our professional trainings. As teacher
leaders/coaches we will be gathering information for teachers so we want to make sure
the research articles we are gathering have good data to backup their claims. Therefore,
it is important for us to know what primary sources/studies they used, identify bias,
determine if the sampling is reasonable, and determine their reliability.
While taking this class we had two opportunities to do this. The first article critique was
for an article called “Investigating Technology-Enhanced Teacher Professional Development
in Rural, High-Poverty Middle Schools” by Blanchard, LePrevost, Tolin and Gutierrez.
To help us to critique this article our professor gave us a set of questions to help guide
our thinking. As we worked through those questions I learned how to identify the research
questions and hypotheses of the researchers even if they weren’t very clear in the article.
It also gave me a better understanding of theoretical and conceptual studies -- a theoretical
study is one that is based on a theory and a conceptual study is based on a particular
concept. In this case the study was looking to see if schools have several technological
trained teachers and technology will students, particularly African American students,
do better on state testing. We then identified the representation and bias of the research
samplings as well as how the sampling was selected and how the sampling may have
affected the study and/or conclusions. Additionally, we determined the reliability of the
tools used and validity of the results. Then we went back and looked at the study method,
limitations and conclusions of the researchers and critiqued them. As a result doing this I
realized not to just accept what researchers say in their article, but to question it more
since their conclusions didn’t match up with the implied research questions and hypotheses
as well as having other factors that might have influenced their results.
Then we had the opportunity to do a second article critique of a primary article about
(Positive Behavior Intervention Systems) PBIS and had to decide if it could be used to
back up a secondary article about PBIS as our final. Once again, it reinforced the idea
that just because it has been published it doesn’t mean that it is a great study as while
going through the primary article as a class we saw many flaws. Having this additional
practice of critiquing of articles improved my comfort level of doing so and I can see the
practical applications when being a teacher leader/educational coach.
For our data analysis assignment, in this class, we used scatter plots that showed end of
year Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC) test results for the years of 2015
and 2016 which compared North Shore School District with other school districts in the
state of Washington in order to identify observations and wonderings. This was relatively
easy for me since in readings, class lectures and online discussions we had learned about
scatter plots and identifying the hypothesis based on the x- and y-axis as well as my
experience in district data analysis meetings I had the opportunity to look at scatter plots
and make observations and wonderings.
How Action Research is Supported by Research
At the beginning of starting this master’s program, I had never heard of "action research,
but as I have gone through classes, I have noticed it in more and more of the articles I have
read in professional magazines such the article entitled “Taking Beautiful RISKS in Education:
To Support Students’ Creativity, Educators Must Question Assumptions and Instill a Sense
of Possibility” which I summarized for my Applying Research in School Settings class. Also, the article “Choose your own Adventure: Action Research for PD” showed how action research valued teacher’s curiosity to improve their practices, made them think about what they wanted to learn so they could refine their questions, established trust and motivation between peers and most importantly let the results affect their teaching practices.
of Possibility” which I summarized for my Applying Research in School Settings class. Also, the article “Choose your own Adventure: Action Research for PD” showed how action research valued teacher’s curiosity to improve their practices, made them think about what they wanted to learn so they could refine their questions, established trust and motivation between peers and most importantly let the results affect their teaching practices.
Overall Impact
As I said earlier, I think that these experiences have made the practice of using action
research to improve my teaching practices something to embrace and use. And by
learning how to critique articles I can do a better job on my literature review part of the
process. By experiencing the process of doing an action research project and critiquing
articles that are based on this process I think that I know more questions to ask and
have a better understanding of how it works and as result can share it with others.
References
Beghetto, R. A.. (2018). Taking beautiful RISKS in education: To support students’ creativity,
educators must question assumptions and instill a sense of possibility. Educational
Leadership, 76(4), 18–24.
educators must question assumptions and instill a sense of possibility. Educational
Leadership, 76(4), 18–24.
Blanchard, M. R., LePrevost, C. E., Tolin, A. D., & Gutierrez, K. S. (2016, April). Investigating
technology-enhanced teacher professional development in rural, high-poverty middle
schools. Educational Researcher, 45(03), 207-220.
Dodman, S., Zuidema, E..., & Kleiman, A. (2018). Choose your own adventure: Action
research for PD. Educational Leadership, 76(3), 72–76.
Ravid, R. (2015). Practical statistics for educators (5th Edition). Landham, MD: Rowman
& Littlefield Publishers, Inc
& Littlefield Publishers, Inc
Scott TM, & Barrett SB. (2004). Using staff and student time engaged in disciplinary procedures to evaluate the impact of school-wide PBS. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6(1), 21–27.
Skiba, R., & Sprague, J. (2008). Safety without suspensions. Educational Leadership,
66(1), 38–43.
Vannice, B. (2019, January 11). Educational Coach Interview [Personal interview]